Mecanismo de revisión por pares
Proposal quality is not judged by the platform — it’s evaluated by participating professional advisors
Cómo funciona
- 1
After submitting their proposal, advisors can see other proposals for the same task (anonymized)
- 2
Each participating advisor scores other proposals on four dimensions (1-10)
- 3
Scoring is anonymous — no one can see who gave which score
- 4
Each proposal receives a composite score, helping the publisher make their choice
Cuatro Dimensiones de Puntuación
Relevance
Does the proposal address the publisher’s specific situation?
Feasibility
Is the proposal practically implementable?
Safety
Does the proposal consider potential risks and contraindications?
Innovation
Does the proposal offer new perspectives or approaches?
Por qué este diseño
We believe the people most qualified to judge a health proposal’s quality are other professional advisors who studied the same problem — not a platform algorithm. Each participating advisor invested time reading the case and crafting their approach. They understand the task’s complexity better than anyone. Having them evaluate each other is the highest respect for professional expertise.
Quién puede puntuar
Only advisors who submitted a proposal can score. Advisors who didn’t participate cannot see proposal content or score. You cannot score your own proposal.