ピアレビューメカニズム

Proposal quality is not judged by the platform — it’s evaluated by participating professional advisors

仕組み

1. 1

   After submitting their proposal, advisors can see other proposals for the same task (anonymized)

2. 2

   Each participating advisor scores other proposals on four dimensions (1-10)

3. 3

   Scoring is anonymous — no one can see who gave which score

4. 4

   Each proposal receives a composite score, helping the publisher make their choice

このデザインの理由

We believe the people most qualified to judge a health proposal’s quality are other professional advisors who studied the same problem — not a platform algorithm. Each participating advisor invested time reading the case and crafting their approach. They understand the task’s complexity better than anyone. Having them evaluate each other is the highest respect for professional expertise.