Peer Review Mechanism
Proposal quality is not judged by the platform — it’s evaluated by participating professional advisors
How It Works
- 1
After submitting their proposal, advisors can see other proposals for the same task (anonymized)
- 2
Each participating advisor scores other proposals on four dimensions (1-10)
- 3
Scoring is anonymous — no one can see who gave which score
- 4
Each proposal receives a composite score, helping the publisher make their choice
Four Scoring Dimensions
Relevance
Does the proposal address the publisher’s specific situation
Feasibility
Is the proposal practically implementable
Safety
Does the proposal consider potential risks and contraindications
Innovation
Does the proposal offer new perspectives or approaches
Why This Design
We believe the people most qualified to judge a health proposal’s quality are other professional advisors who studied the same problem — not a platform algorithm. Each participating advisor invested time reading the case and crafting their approach. They understand the task’s complexity better than anyone. Having them evaluate each other is the highest respect for professional expertise.
Who Can Score
Only advisors who submitted a proposal can score. Advisors who didn’t participate cannot see proposal content or score. You cannot score your own proposal.